Virginia Democrat gubernatorial candidate Terry McAuliffe on Tuesday abruptly ended an interview with 7News and berated the reporter for asking tough questions.

“Ok, we’re over! You should have asked better questions early on. You should have asked questions your viewers care about,” McAuliffe said as he got up from his seat and ended the interview after only 10 minutes.

“Well, we did,” the reporter said.

VIDEO:

Here’s the awkward video of @TerryMcAuliffe walking out half way through what was supposed to be 20 minute interview with local ABC affiliate pic.twitter.com/EjQ6OL22Fo

— Brent Scher (@BrentScher) October 19, 2021

7News said the reporter gave both Virginia gubernatorial candidates 20 minutes each (read the full transcript of both interviews here).

McAuliffe decided to end the interview after only 10 minutes.

The reporter asked McAuliffe if he wanted to correct the record on his previous comment that parents shouldn’t tell schools what to teach their kids.

He said “no.”

McAuliffe falsely claimed AGAIN that “Critical Race Theory is not taught in Virginia” and said opposing it is “racist.”

The reporter also asked about crime and public safety.

McAuliffe couldn’t take the heat and ran away.

“We do want to point out that the Terry McAuliffe interview is shorter than our interview with Glenn Youngkin – that was not by our doing,” a 7News anchor said.

VIDEO:

WATCH: Terry McAuliffe cut off an interview and berated a reporter for asking tough questions. #VAgov pic.twitter.com/wAaleFdF9f

— Team Youngkin (@TeamYoungkin) October 19, 2021

The post “You Should Have Asked Questions Your Viewers Care About” – Democrat Terry McAuliffe Abruptly Ends Interview, Berates Reporter For Asking Tough Questions (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

At a time when our country is going through a very apparent inflation crisis, you would think that the Biden administration would want more workers not less. However, the vaccine mandates that Biden is pushing, which many agree are unconstitutional, are affecting everyone from hospital workers to military members.

Several military members have made a video stating their names, the jobs they do in their service, and where they have been deployed. These are the faces of the men who will likely be separated from the Military.

Noah Sturgeos Johnson

“My name is Noah Sturgeos Johnson. I’m a specialist in the United States Army. I am currently stationed at Fort Eustis, Virginia. As an 88 Kilo watercraft operator. Due to the new order of the COVID-19 vaccine, I will potentially face separation from the United States Army and I’m currently pending a religious exemption.”

Trent West

“My name is Trent West. I’m a petty officer, third class in the United States Navy. I’ve been serving honorably for exactly two years, and I will continue to do so. I’ve been stationed at Naval Air Station, Pensacola, Florida, and I’m currently stationed Naval Air Station North Island in Coronado, California, and fulfilling my duties. I’ve been assigned to be a lead junior sailor in our mentorship and training program. And I take great pride in doing so. I will potentially be discharged for denying the COVID 19 vaccine.”

Lucas Jeffers

“My name is Lucas Jeffers. I am a corporal in the United States Marine Corps. I have served honorably for three years and four months and will continue to do so. For the entirety of my career, I have been stationed at MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, California. I have deployed to northern Syria and northern Iraq in fulfilling my duties. I have been an FTC chief and an 81 section leader. I will potentially be discharged for refusing the COVID 19 vaccine.”

Ryan Lovell

“My name is Ryan Lovell, I’m a sergeant in the United States Marine Corps. I’ve served honorably for nine years and four months, I’ve been to Camp Lejeune and Camp Pendleton deployed to Romania, Israel and Saudi Arabia, in fulfilling my duties as a combat engineer I’ve been a squad leader, section head, and an instructor. I will potentially be discharged for denying the COVID 19 vaccine.”

You would think that the U.S. military would be made up of brave young men who are willing to stand up and fight for what they believe in, unfortunately, it seems as if many of those men will be separated due to a likely unconstitutional mandate. Instead, we are left with “woke” generals who are more interested in combatting ‘white rage’ and losing wars… And of course, don’t forget our newest Admiral Levine.

The post WATCH: Here Are The Faces Of The Military Men Who Are Potentially Being Lost Due To The Unconstitutional Vaccine Mandate (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

In the midst of the ongoing border crisis, Republican Texas Sen. Ted Cruz filed legislation on Tuesday that would establish processing centers for illegal immigrants in areas such as Martha’s Vineyard and other Democrat-led communities.

Earlier this month, Cruz said: “For the past ten months, President Biden and his administration have willingly surrendered the United States’ southern border to dangerous criminal cartels, with no thought given to the South Texas border communities like McAllen and Del Rio, which are running low on resources from dealing with this massive influx of illegal immigrants,”  The legislation was introduced before Cruz made his statement.

“That’s why today I am introducing this crucial legislation to alleviate the massive overload at the southern border by establishing new ports of entry in Democrat-led communities such as North Hero, Vermont, where Bernie Sanders spends his summers, and Martha’s Vineyard, where Democrat elites host their cocktail parties,” Cruz continued.

I’m introducing crucial legislation to alleviate the massive overload at the southern border by establishing new ports of entry in Democrat-led communities such as Martha’s Vineyard, where Democrat elites host their cocktail parties. #BidenBorderCrisis https://t.co/3cX9i8NPlk

— Senator Ted Cruz (@SenTedCruz) October 19, 2021

According to the law, 13 new ports of entry would be established in towns across the United States, and all illegal aliens apprehended at Border Patrol Sectors in Texas would be transported to one of the 13 new ports of entry for processing.

The following locations would be home to the thirteen new ports:

Block Island, Rhode Island

Greenwich, Connecticut

Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts

Cambridge (Massachusetts)

Governors Island, New York City

Rehoboth Beach, Delaware

Nantucket, Massachusetts

Newport, Rhode Island

Scarsdale, New York

Palo Alto, California

Yountville, California

St. Helena, California

North Hero, Vermont

Cruz stated that the Texas government was forced to proclaim a state of disaster and dedicate its law enforcement and financial resources to dealing with the problem. “Local Border Patrol Sectors in Texas continue to be overwhelmed by the volume of illegal aliens at the border. The Texas government has been forced to declare a state of disaster and provide its law enforcement and fiscal resources to address the crisis.”

Cruz reported that he encountered human traffickers and cartel members while traveling to the border in early March. One of his recordings showed him saying, “That’s Mexico and you can see there are three smugglers right there standing on the Mexican side looking at us.”

The post Ted Cruz Introduces Bill That Would Send Illegal Immigrants To The Towns Of Rich White Liberals For Processing appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Yesterday President Trump released a statement regarding the unconstitutional actions by the Jan 6 Congressional Committee that is acting like communist prosecutors.  Their actions are atrocious.

Here is the statement in its entirety.

Today, President Donald J. Trump filed a lawsuit in defense of the Constitution, the Office of the President, and the future of our nation, all of which the sham Unselect Committee is trying to destroy. The fact is America is under assault by Pelosi’s Communist-style attempt to silence and destroy America First patriots through this hyper-partisan and illegitimate investigation.

o    The January 6th Committee is a partisan sham to distract Americans from the Democrats’ policies that are killing and robbing Americans. For example:

o    The Border crisis is flooding our communities with drugs and gangs, while costing taxpayers billions.

o    The Democrats’ mismanagement of COVID exposed America’s elderly to a deadly disease and then in many cases, forced them to die alone.

o    By defunding the police and embracing criminals, Democrats have made our cities less safe.

o    The unconstitutional mandates are destroying the economy.

The media is complicit in advancing the Committee’s unconstitutionally flawed request.

This committee exposed itself as a sham by requesting documents which serve no legitimate legislative purpose—what does President Trump’s campaign polling data from Florida have to do with an investigation into January 6th?

The Legal Argument—Three Pillars

1. No Legitimate Legislative Purpose: The legislative committees’ request fails to meet the basic requirement of fulfilling a legislative purpose. The request is not just overly broad, it requests documents including campaign polling data—what does Congress hope to learn from this?
   1. Newsflash: Polling shows Biden’s approval cratering and 2022 slipping out of Democrats’ grasp—no wonder the Democrats and the media want to distract America from: The surrender in Afghanistan, skyrocketing inflation, a border crisis, crippling COVID mandates, and a stalled legislative agenda.
2. Former Presidents have inherent Constitutional Rights of Privilege: An incumbent administration does not have the constitutional authority to unilaterally waive the executive privilege of a previous administration—especially one so recent.  If it did, then executive privilege doesn’t exist, including for Joe Biden.
   1. Newsflash: No one is following this argument more closely than: (1) Hunter Biden and his art dealer, (2) The Woke Generals and Intel leaders who advised the Surrender in Afghanistan and the bombing of innocent civilians and children (3) Big Tech who has been actively engaged with the Biden administration to subvert Democracy through dark money organizations
3. Time for Review: The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) has not even had the time to compile and organize the documents being requested by Congress—which is the largest request in American History. President Trump and Joe Biden should be afforded the time to diligently review any protected and privileged documents before it is released to the public.
   1. Newsflash: The Committee is motivated by one thing: delivering political wins for the Democrats. That’s why they’ve set a rapid timetable that steamrolls the Constitution, legal precedent, and established process. The Committee isn’t seeking the truth, it’s seeking Communist-style political persecution of President Trump and the America First patriots who served their country honorably.

President Trump is right.  

The post “The Committee Isn’t Seeking the Truth, It’s Seeking Communist-Style Political Persecution of President Trump and the America First Patriots” – President Trump on the Unconstitutional Actions of the Jan 6 Committee appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

In a dramatic shift in their enforcement policy that concerns the recordability of adverse reactions from vaccines, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) published a new Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) explaining that employers no longer need to report adverse reactions that their employees contract from COVID-19 vaccines.

The change was made because OSHA and other federal agencies are “working diligently” to push propaganda that compels people to take the experimental vaccine. The worker protection agency does not even want to hint at “any appearance of discouraging workers” from receiving the jab – as a result, they are no longer going to enforce 29 CFR 1904’s recording requirements that make businesses report vaccine side effects.

The OSHA website FAQ now reads:

“DOL and OSHA, as well as other federal agencies, are working diligently to encourage COVID-19 vaccinations.

OSHA does not wish to have any appearance of discouraging workers from receiving COVID-19 vaccination, and also does not wish to disincentivize employers’ vaccination efforts.

As a result, OSHA will not enforce 29 CFR 1904’s recording requirements to require any employers to record worker side effects from COVID-19 vaccination at least through May 2022. We will reevaluate the agency’s position at that time to determine the best course of action moving forward.”

The policy change will run at least through May of 2022 and applies in all situations – including if an employer requires, recommends, or incentivizes employees to receive the vaccine.

NEW – The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) will not enforce 29 CFR 1904’s recording requirements to require employers to record worker side effects from #COVID19 vaccination.https://t.co/3WZckNOwrV pic.twitter.com/dxozonYnA3

— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) October 19, 2021

When OSHA updated their website with the new guidelines, the federal agency also removed three earlier FAQs, which had fully explained an employer’s responsibility to report adverse reactions depending on whether the vaccines were required or simply recommended (compelled).

In the previous version of the FAQ, the agency made it clear that adverse reactions from COVID-19 vaccines that are required by an employer would need to be recorded, but did not mandate reporting requirements if the business had only recommended their workers take the vaccine.

The two scenarios used to be properly differentiated on the agency’s web page which made it unquestionable when a business was exempt from reporting the vaccine side effects, stating that “the vaccine must be truly voluntary” in order to qualify.

From the now-deleted OSHA FAQ regarding vaccine side effect reporting:

“Note that for this discretion to apply, the vaccine must be truly voluntary.  For example, an employee’s choice to accept or reject the vaccine cannot suffer any repercussions from their choice. 

If employees are not free to choose whether or not to receive the vaccine without fearing adverse action, then the vaccine is not merely “recommended” and employers should consult the above FAQ regarding COVID-19 vaccines that are a condition of employment.”

But now almost every business – especially the larger corporations – is requiring workers to take the experimental jab to keep their jobs. Thanks to OSHAs preemptive change in policy, they no longer have to report ANY adverse reactions until the middle of next year.

Instead of being open, honest, and transparent about the vaccines, the federal government has worked tirelessly to cover up anything that would be considered negative towards the Covid jab.

What are they hiding?

If the vaccine was so safe – or if these authoritarians cared about saving lives – wouldn’t they want adverse reactions to be recorded and looked into?

Well, the problem is they don’t care, and the vaccine – along with its poor efficacy – has had terrible side effects for many people.

The public health experts and the corrupt politicians on Capitol Hill have demonstrated time and again that this ‘pandemic’ was always just a farce to seize more power.

The post What Are They Hiding? OSHA Announces They Will Not Enforce Policy That Requires Employers Record Their Worker’s Adverse Reactions to Covid-19 Vaccine “At Least Through May 2022” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Pfizer used its power to “shift risk and maximize profits” according to leaked, unredacted contracts obtained by Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy group.

Pfizer has been accused of bullying and shaking down governments during Covid vaccine negotiations – much of their wheeling and dealing has been done in secret.

New contracts reveal Pfizer took a hard line in push for profits with the least amount of exposure and risk.

The “contracts consistently place Pfizer’s interests before public health imperatives,” said Zain Rizvi, the Public Citizen researcher who released the report.

Sharon Castillo, a spokeswoman for Pfizer, said that confidentiality clauses were “standard in commercial contracts” and “intended to help build trust between the parties, as well as protect the confidential commercial information exchanged during negotiations and included in final contracts.”

Joe Biden and many Democrat officials have imposed Covid vaccine mandates because of Pfizer’s demands and secret contract negotiations – and as a result, Americans are losing their jobs.

Washington Post reported (emphasis ours):

Public Citizen found common themes across contracts, including not only secrecy but also language to block donations of Pfizer doses. Disputes are settled in secret arbitration courts, with Pfizer able to change the terms of key decisions, including delivery dates, and demand public assets as collateral.

Experts who reviewed the terms of contracts with foreign governments suggested that some demands were extreme. In contracts reached with Brazil, Chile, Colombia and the Dominican Republic, those states forfeited “immunity against precautionary seizure of any of [their] assets.”

“It’s almost as if the company would ask the United States to put the Grand Canyon as collateral,” said Lawrence Gostin, a professor of public health law at Georgetown University.

The company rejected that logic. “Pfizer has not interfered and has absolutely no intention of interfering with any country’s diplomatic, military, or culturally significant assets,” Castillo said. “To suggest anything to the contrary is irresponsible and misleading.”

Some contract demands appear to have slowed vaccine rollouts in countries. At least two countries walked away from negotiations and publicly criticized the company’s demands. However, both later reached agreements with Pfizer.

In contracts with Brazil, Chile, Colombia, the Dominican Republic and Peru, governments were required to sign a document that says each “expressly and irrevocably waives any right of immunity which either it or its assets may have or acquire in the future.” The first four also were required to waive immunity against “precautionary” seizure of their assets.

Public Citizen found contracts that required governments “‘to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Pfizer’ from and against any and all suits, claims, actions, demands, damages, costs and expenses related to vaccine intellectual property.”

Click here to read the full report.

The post Leaked Contracts Reveal Pfizer Used its Power to “Shift Risk and Maximize Profits” in Negotiations with Governments appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Joe Biden’s approval rating hit a new low of 37 percent in the Quinnipiac poll released Tuesday, down from 38 percent two weeks ago. Biden’s disapproval is at 52 percent, down from 53 percent two weeks ago. But the big news from the poll is Biden’s approval among independents has plummeted to 28 percent, down from 32 percent two weeks ago.

Last week Biden’s approval among independents just barely dipped into the 20s, at 29.8 percent in the Economist/YouGov poll. The Q-Poll confirms Biden’s collapse among independents.

Quinnipiac buried the lede of Biden’s collapse with independents in their report on their poll, focusing instead on President Trump’s improving numbers among Republicans and improving support for a border wall: “78% Of Republicans Want To See Trump Run For President In 2024, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Americans Now Split On Border Wall As Opposition Softens”

Other observations from the poll:

Biden is now underwater with women at 43 percent approve, 45 percent disapprove. Men’s approve disapprove of Biden is a brutal 30/59.

Biden has crashed with Hispanics who give him an approve/disapprove of 33/51. White’s approve/disapprove of Biden is 33/59. Black approve/disapprove of Biden is down in dangerous territory for a Democrat, 65/22.

The post Disaster: Biden Hits New Low of 28 Percent Approval by Independents in New Quinnipiac Poll appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.