Ideal for that quick, spur-of-the-moment day trip or tailgating party, the ORCA Walker Tote is an ultralight soft-sided cooler that offers great durability and ice retention.
These days there is a glut of coolers on the market. It can be hard to tell the difference between various kinds and what makes them worth the price tag. The ORCA Walker Tote is an ultralight option, weighing 3.6 pounds dry, that is versatile, holds 18 cans, and is very easy to use for a variety of trips from camping to backyard barbecues.
So, out of all the coolers, why this one?
In short: ORCA’s big brother, the Walker 20 Cooler, made GearJunkie’s Best Soft Coolers list, so we were intrigued to see a new Walker cooler hitting the shelves. This is a slightly smaller version, for those looking for the same level of cold storage in a more compact form. And aside from boasting a tote style, this Walker has an updated, slimmer design and new volume.
ORCA Walker Tote Cooler Review: First Impressions
(Photo/David Young)
While touted as a soft-sided cooler, the ORCA is very stout and well built. From top to bottom, the cooler is crafted with durability in mind. The zipper is a Master Seal #10 waterproof zipper, ensuring the ORCA is leakproof and will keep contents cold for 24 hours and beyond.
The sides are heavily insulated, and the underside has tough, rubberized padded skin for added protection when you set the cooler down on sand and rocks. The bottom line, it is ready to rock right out of the box.
Opening and carrying the ORCA Walker Tote cooler is a breeze with the easy-open magnetic split handle. Rather than clasping together, the two-sided handles interlock and hold in place easily with strong magnets.
It’s an intuitive and simple mechanism to carry the cooler. The opposing magnets also stay open when unzipping the cooler, making access to the interior a breeze.
Compared to the Walker 20, the Walker Tote is a bit smaller: ½-inch shorter in length, 2 inches shorter in height, and 1½-inch shorter in width. They share similar designs, materials, and features.
ORCA Walker Tote Specs
Length: 15 in.
Width: 9.5 in.
Height: 15.25 in.
Dry weight: 3.6 lbs.
Max load: 50 lbs.
Claimed hours iced/cold: 12-24 hrs.
Ice retention test: ~28 hrs. iced
Cooler Test While Chilling Poolside
With a trip set for Arizona, I loaded up the cooler with some beer — 16 cans, to be exact — and set out on the road. The just over foot-high cooler fit snugly in the trunk of my car as I headed to the desert.
The cooler started about a quarter full of ice, and I let it sit in the trunk for the 2-day drive in some 70-degree weather. When I arrived, I opened the cooler to find most of the ice melted, but the drinks were still cold.
I restocked the ice and brews and tested out the ORCA poolside. And here is where it excels. This is what the ORCA Walker Tote is made for: a grab-and-go poolside session. The exterior side pocket held a paperback book and my sunglasses, while the cooler transported the canned brews with ease. (There’s an interior waterproof pocket as well.)
The detachable padded shoulder strap made it simple to carry the cooler to and from the pool, and the tote fits nicely by a chair or table without getting in the way. It really is an ideal size for a day out.
(Photo/David Young)
A Known Issue
Overall, I was impressed by the ORCA Walker Tote. However, during my trip, the metal clasp holding the shoulder harness to the Tote broke, rendering the shoulder carry option useless. For the price of the cooler and the “durability” tag, I was disappointed to see this during the use of a normal road trip.
ORCA stated that this is an issue they are aware of and that clasps have broken from time to time. ORCA has a 3-year warranty that includes manufacturer defects such as a break like this. It’s worth noting that ORCA does expect to have the issue fixed in updated versions of both the Walker Tote and Walker 20 slated for fall 2022. (We’ll keep you updated.)
The other drawback is that the mouth of the cooler has difficulty staying open and, as a result, can be hard to fill with ice. Aside from this, the cooler performed well.
The Walker Tote’s body is strong, it keeps its contents cold, it’s easy to transport, and it looks good. (You may even get some jealous glances of cooler envy!) If it were not for the broken shoulder strap clasp and small guarded entry, it’d be the ideal tote for nearly any road trip or waterfront adventure.
Overall, this is a durable light cooler that looks good and offers great ice retention for a day trip. It’s compact, capable, and tough — throw it in the back of your vehicle, and beverages or food will be good to go when you hit the beach or pool.
Home » Food / Hydration » After 17 Years, LifeStraw Upgrades Iconic Filter Straw With New ‘Peak Series’
After 17 years, the outdoor water filtration specialist has updated its original filter straw — and launched a new generation of Peak Series filtering devices along with it.
LifeStraw’s new take on its original filtering straw is part of the brand’s Peak Series which will be available in mid-March 2022. With its new Peak line of filtration systems, LifeStraw promises improved microfilter performance, slimmed-down form factors, universal threading for more versatile applications, custom leakproof caps, and hardier materials than previous versions.
We had the chance to check out the Peak Series at the Outdoor Retailer Winter Market 2022 trade show, where we awarded it Best in Show. As we wrote then, these products stand out thanks to LifeStraw’s attention to detail.
The brand addressed big flaws in water filtering systems. For example, the squeeze and gravity filter systems have a screw-on backflush piston, a system that simplifies the effective cleaning of clogged filters in the field.
While we haven’t tested these yet, the first samples arrived in our office this week. We look forward to putting them through the paces and will review them soon.
Let’s see what the LifeStraw Peak Series has on tap.
Key features: All-in-one filtration and storage device, optimized membrane density for clog reduction, leakproof over-cap with 2x durability over other bottles
Filter: Removable; compatible with Peak gravity systems and emergency flask extension, non-LifeStraw water bottles
Ideal for: Climbing, thru-hiking, trail running, cycling, and more
Key features: Optimized cartridge for sand/silt removal and high flow rate, works as a gravity system, large squeeze bottle, or leakproof water storage
Filter: Removable; designed for standalone “straw” use and compatible with standard water bottles
Ideal for: Backpacking, small group camping
MSRP: $60
Gravity Water Filter (8L) + Water Storage Bag (8L) + 47″ Hose
Key features: Dromedary/filtration hybrid system, high flow rate quick-connect and twist spout, clog-proof filtration, leakproof storage, 840-denier and nylon-reinforced fabric
Filter: Removable; designed for standalone “straw” use and compatible with standard water bottles
Ideal for: RV, large group camping, personal
MSRP: $80
Clean Water for Causes
And if you’re on the fence about which water filter to purchase for your spring romp in the wild, consider this: LifeStraw is actively supplying water filters and purifiers for distribution to Ukrainians displaced by the ongoing war.
“This week, we shipped over 800 purifiers and filters to Romania to be distributed to refugees and internally displaced peoples,” stated company CEO Alison Hill. “And we are in the process of shipping additional filters to other organizations.”
But this isn’t LifeStraw’s first brush with humanitarian relief — far from it. It established the LifeStraw Give Back program years ago, which provides one child in need with an entire year of access to clean drinking water for every one of its products sold. That commitment continues through today. And as of 2021, more than 6 million children around the globe have benefitted from the Give Back program.
Ideal for that quick spur-of-the-moment day trip or tailgating party, the ORCA Walker Tote is an ultralight soft-sided cooler that is durable and able to keep your beverages or food nice and cold for a quick getaway. Read more…
Home » Food / Hydration » YETI Adds Magnetic Closure to Hopper M20 Backpack: First Look
First came YETI coolers, then backpack coolers, then magnetic coolers, and, finally, YETI magnetic backpack coolers. Meet the Hopper M20 Backpack.
When YETI launched its M30 cooler with magnetic closure in 2019, it garnered plenty of attention and loads of praise. After all, YETI has fought off no small number of knockoffs to its burly designs, and this patented magnetic closure offered a new, more difficult-to-replicate twist to YETI’s arsenal.
But, as our — and subsequently others’ — testing revealed, the Austin brand’s “MagShield” tech proved a little too good. Sure, it was easier to open compared to YETI’s beefy zippered alternatives. But the design also made it difficult to keep open.
Enter version 2.0 of YETI’s MagShield access. YETI unveiled the patented magnet tech last month on the new M30. Today, the brand launches the M20 Backpack cooler — the first time the tech has graced a YETI cooler backpack.
(Photo/Sean McCoy)
Best of all, version 2.0 purports to solve the keep-open problem. We received an advance sample to verify and try out.
First Look Review: YETI Hopper M20 Cooler Backpack
In fairness to the original M30 cooler bag, it wasn’t the only YETI to fluster some users. The OG BackFlip cooler, lauded for its durable, waterproof construction, posed its own challenges. Namely, the watertight zippers were so beefy and locked the lid so tight, it confounded some users.
What’s more, it also commanded a little TLC from the owner, with every BackFlip including lubricant to help keep the zipper in proper working order.
But it seems the rising tide of new YETI tech will lift its portable cooler fleet. The Hopper M20 Backpack is a literal snap to open and close. Just pull the tab, and the top-loading cooler yawns open. More importantly, take your hands off, and it stays open.
(Photo/Sean McCoy)
Loading is indeed easier than the previous M30 and at least as easy as the BackFlip.
But the Hopper M20’s construction also sets it apart from its BackFlip counterpart. Whereas the BackFlip had a mostly rigid shape and feel, the M20 offers up a more pliant figure. It’s noticeably more forgiving to compression and a little softer on the back. This is a welcome improvement for a cooler backpack.
M20 Cooler Backpack Specs
On paper, the M20 bears a striking resemblance to the BackFlip. Both have the same abrasion-resistant shell, “ColdCell” insulation, and leakproof interior. They also both sport daisy chains along the face, sides, and shoulder straps to attach key carabiners or any of YETI’s handy accessories.
The base is solid and helps keep the Hopper M20’s shape throughout. Once closed, two side-release buckles cinch down the folded-over top. Finally, a top handle and two side handles offer a range of carry options off the back.
Empty, the cooler backpack weighs just shy of 5.5 pounds (about the same as the BackFlip).
As the name suggests, the M20 has a 20L capacity. This makes it a wee bit smaller than the 24L BackFlip. But in testing, the M20 offers plenty of room for a full 12-pack of cans (beer, soda, or skinny seltzers) and enough ice to keep it all cold for a full weekend of adventure (YETI promises multiday ice retention).
It’s not often you get to butcher whole animals with a ton of different wild game processing gear on site. And MEAT! made it both intuitive and easy.
Like air or water, food is — at its most basic — a human necessity. But it’s also an art form, a realm of craft, and a pursuit that can be as academic as you’d like it to be.
For me, food is not only these three things — it’s also a physical pursuit. As a hunter, I am intimately connected to what I’d call “making meat” or what most hunters would refer to as “filling the freezer.” Wild game processing is an arduous, time-consuming, and ever-evolving process.
And I’m also, by nature and profession, an attentive consumer both of meat and products. I prefer to eat meat that I have a relationship to, and I prefer to use products that will take good care of the meat that I’ve procured.
Funny enough, a company namedMEAT! makes products for, you guessed it, processing meat. I got the chance to use a plethora of their amazing gear in Texas. And it was a fun, flawless, and educational process.
In short: I got the chance to try a lot of MEAT! products. And I processed a ton of meat using this equipment. Below is both a brand overview and a review of what it currently offers direct-to-consumer, from meat grinders to vacuum sealers, and everything in between.
Wild Game Processing Gear From MEAT!
MEAT! is not only its own sentence; it’s also a brand that focuses solely on helping normal people level up their meat processing, from gear for your kitchen to educational material to cutting out the middlemen with a direct-to-consumer business model.
This last piece? It keeps money in your pocket while maximizing what you’re getting from the brand’s side. Thefolks at MEAT! want to be your go-to source for everything related to processing what you bring home from the field, whether it’s a whitetail deer, a trophy elk, or a homebred lamb.
And the process is its clear focus. Processing, preparing, and preserving are the thematic drivers for the gear MEAT! puts in your kitchen. Let’s get into some of its offerings.
Grinders: All About Horsepower
MEAT! grinders, hard at work; (photo/Nicole Qualtieri)
If you’ve ever used a crappy meat grinder, the thought of grinding meat can feel nearly traumatic. As someone who has put my purchasing power into a sub-par grinder, I’ll tell you that it’s worth shelling out a bit more cash for a machine that will meet you more than halfway.
The MEAT! grinders are the best I’ve tried. And it makes sense: they’ve got horsepower behind them. The two grinders I used had 1 and 1.5 horsepower, respectively. And each made grinding an easy-to-do, easy-to-clean experience.
MEAT! offers five grinders as small as 500 watts ($119) up to 1.5 horsepower($699). The major difference here is how many pounds per minute you can move through the grinders, from 4 pounds per minute with the 500-watt machine up to 18 pounds per minute with 1.5 horsepower.
Each grinder has safety features built in to protect fingers, and even the most affordable grinder features heavy-duty construction and multiple plates designed to last. If you’re a new hunter, an apartment dweller, or a rare grinder, don’t overlook the more compact options for wild game processing.
MEAT! Mixers, Sausage Stuffers for Wild Game
(Photo/Nicole Qualtieri)
Hand-Cranked Mixers
Once the meat is ground, you’ve got a few choices. You might choose to make sausage or bag up the burger. If you opt for the former, MEAT! has the gear for that as well.
Two hand-cranked meat mixers(mostly) take the biceps out of meat mixing. The only real difference between the two is capacity: one mixes up to 20 pounds ($180), the other 50 ($350). I’d say the 20-pound mixer is appropriate for the great majority of us — unless you’re the kind of sausage party-thrower who goes real big.
That said, the hand-cranked machines are simple to use. You want to mix sausage until it’s a bit tacky and the proteins are sufficiently stretchy; this will help with texture.
Pro tip: Table clamps make mixing a lot easier. But they don’t come with the mixers. I highly recommend purchasing one or two to make this process easier.
Stuffing the Sausage
The stuffers, on the other hand, take a bit of getting used to for newbies. These are also available in two options: 5 pounds ($160) and 15 pounds($300). It’s not that they’re difficult to use; it’s that making sausage requires a smidge of finesse.
You’ll alternate hand cranking with guiding the sausage into the casing at a rate that, well, allows you to keep up. This is where a bit of finagling comes in. But it’s a fun kind of finagling. And it can be a bit easier with two people, just for clarity.
MEAT! made a great video (above) that covers both mixers and stuffers, and it’s super helpful in learning how to make sausage easily and effectively.
Vacuum Sealers
Bagging It Up
I’ll be honest; I didn’t own a vacuum sealer up until last year. I simply wrapped meat in plastic cling wrap and freezer wrap, and I stuck it in the freezer with no issue. But, it’s a hell of a time suck to do it correctly. So to take some of the suck out of that process, I’m putting some actual suck back into it.
Enter MEAT! vacuum sealers. Chamber sealers are super cool, and if you have the space and need for one, MEAT! has two available.
One is offered with an oilless pump for $700; this cuts down on maintenance. And the other Chamber Vacuum Sealer($800) requires a bit more maintenance but will likely last forever if maintained properly.
MEAT! also offers three external vacuum sealers. The 16″ External Vacuum Sealer ($300) tops the list with a commercial-grade sealing process, and it’s capable of sealing both dry and wet food.
Next, the Pro External Vacuum Sealer ($180) features a 14-inch sealing strip as well as an adjustable seal time and vacuum. The base-level sealer($80) is a bit smaller at 12 inches, but like all MEAT! gear, it boasts a lot of durability and commercial-grade process for the long haul.
Chamber or External?
I used both chamber sealers and a few of the external sealers. The chambers are obviously slick. It’s fun to watch, and they both do a great job on most cuts. They also have the benefit of being able to seal wet items, like a piece of meat in a marinade or even something like chili or stew.
The issue with having just a chamber sealer is that if it doesn’t fit, it doesn’t get sealed. So for larger, bone-in cuts, like back hams, racks of ribs, shanks, and blade roasts, an external sealer is necessary.
And if you’re not commercially processing, it’s likely the only sealer you need. The wider seal strip is helpful if you do like to keep larger cuts of meat intact, or if you’re hunting bigger creatures like elk and moose.
The Nerdiest Way to Cook Meat: Sous Vide
MEAT! Sous Vide 10 in action, with salmon in the works; (photo/Nicole Qualtieri)
The sous vide trend has been around the hunting world for a while. Personally, I think it’s pretty nerdy in a good way. It feels weird to give meat a warm bath, but essentially this is what you’re doing. (Hold the soap plz!) And having a vacuum sealer on hand makes this process a bit easier, as the meat simply stays in the vacuum-sealed bag for the duration of the cooking time.
MEAT! boasts two sous vides: the Sous Vide 4($130) and the Sous Vide 10($200). The numbers refer to the amount of water each machine can warm, 4 and 10 gallons, respectively.
For the majority of home cooks, the Sous Vide 4 is perfect. It heats water from 41 to 194 degrees, allowing meat to cook evenly and slowly in a perfectly controlled environment. Hashtag nerdy. But also really cool.
As part of our butchering education, we used sous vide to make scrapple and salmon. Each cooked in the warm water for a determined amount of time, and they both turned out to be unbelievably good.
If you’re kind of a kitchen nerd who loves to play with fun stuff, a sous vide is absolutely for you.
Dehydrators, Accessories, and More From MEAT!
In addition to all this cool stuff, MEAT! also offers a 10-tray dehydrator ($280) as well as a six-tray dehydrator ($130). I’m not much of a jerky gal, but I love having a dehydrator on hand for fruits, veggies, dog treats, backpacking meals, and more.
And if you are a jerky person, MEAT! also has a jerky gun ($36) for a more mixed take on the treat.
Accessories abound, from a meat saw to scales to freezer bags and even to apparel, MEAT! covers a lot of its bases. And expect more from the brand in this area soon, as the folks at MEAT! continue to double down on the wild game processing lifestyle.
Final Thoughts: Wild Game Processing With MEAT!
Obviously, I had some fun both working with MEAT!’s equipment and playing with words throughout this review. But really, MEAT! is an impressive company with passionate folks who want to better the contents of your freezer from the field to the table.
Part of the betterment involves leveling up our wild game processing gear as we go. I imagine that MEAT!’s products will be sticking with me through a lot of my future freezer hauls, and I expect that they will perform up to snuff.
Because of MEAT!’s direct-to-consumer focus, it also has an awesome customer service crew that will help you figure out and replace things if anything goes wrong.
I love a company that invests in both products and people. MEAT! is doing just that.
I particularly like that in nearly every bracket of offering, it makes an entry-level yet commercial-grade product that most anyone can afford for wild game processing or just processing meat from the butcher. That, to me, is the ultimate pinnacle of really respecting a brand’s entire community.
And since my trip to Texas, I’ve chowed down on meals made thanks to this gear. It has yet to disappoint. Impressive. If you’re looking to go deeper into processing, MEAT! is a helluva brand to start with.
The right stove makes life on the trail better. From ultralight canisters to four-season and multifuel options, we’ve found and tested the best backpacking stoves.
Sure, you could just eat a handfulof trail mix or a can of tuna, but it’s hard to beat a hot meal after a long day on the trail. On the other hand, you want to keep your pack weight low. Luckily, there are plenty of backpacking stoves on the market today that make quick work of heating up dinner without weighing you down.
We spend a lot of time camped out in the backcountry, so we understand how important it is to have a reliable, long-lasting stove. From multiday trips on the PCT or AT to lightweight overnights in the Rocky Mountains and staff camp trips, we logged a lot of time preparing meals outside and testing stoves.
The primary factors we looked at were weight, packed size, boil time, and simmer abilities. Secondarily, we considered fuel efficiency, performance in wind and cold, and additional stove features.
While there isn’t a single backpacking stove that’s best for everyone out there, we’ve organized this guide into categories to help you find the best stove for you. Below you’ll find our best picks for budget, wind performance, and more, as well as the best options in the following categories:
In each section is an explanation of the category and the options within it. And at the end of this article is a buyer’s guide with useful tips on choosing the best backpacking stove.
And it’s worth noting this article focuses solely on backpacking stoves. If you’re looking for a larger two-burner camp stove, check out the best camping stoves of 2022.
The Best Backpacking Stoves of 2022
The majority of stoves we tested were canister stoves. While these stoves aren’t the only option on the market, they do have lots of perks, which we’ll explain in detail below.
A lineup of canister backpacking stoves we tested.
Canister Stoves
These stoves typically screw directly onto a fuel canister filled with a blend of isobutane-propane. Benefits include ease of use and low maintenance.
On the flipside, canisters can’t be refilled, causing additional waste (they can be recycled, but you’ll need to take them to a recycling facility). And they’re prone to freezing up or providing a weak flame in cold winter conditions.
The MSR PocketRocket Deluxe ($70) is similar to the MSR PocketRocket 2 (see below) but with a few improvements and extra features.
The Deluxe model is an ultralight stove with stainless steel folding pot legs, a fast boiling time, and a compact design. The Deluxe is just a few grams heavier than the PocketRocket2. But unlike the 2, the Deluxe has a built-in pressure regulator (like in the MSR WindBurner), a broader burner with wind protection, and a piezo igniter.
During testing, we found the pressure regulator did equate to more consistent boil and simmer capabilities and helped reduce the impact of cold and wind on stove performance. It also boiled faster than all but one other stove on this list.
Plus, the simmer capabilities of this stove are great. The slightly wider burner makes a difference, and when cooking dishes like oatmeal or mac and cheese, we didn’t experience any burning or sticking on the bottom of the pot.
Simply put, this stove is the best due to its combination of light weight, consistent performance, boil time, and price.
Weight: 2.9 oz.
Time to reach boil: 3 minutes, 23 seconds (all boil times listed in this article are for 1 L of water)
The GSI Outdoors Glacier ($28) has a lot going for it, not just the amazing price. The canister stove can support virtually any size pot or pan (great for those who frequently camp and cook in groups), and the wider burner spreads heat out evenly.
The burner also has an impressive output of 11,000 BTUs, putting the power of a traditional camp stove in canister stove form. Given the output, we were hoping this stove would have a slightly faster boil time. That said, it held up in windy conditions, and the boil time stayed roughly the same.
The stove also has clearly marked +/- simmer controls. We loved using this stove to pan fry, sauté, and even rehydrate and cook some beans. Everything in the pan was nice and evenly cooked.
Our only con? The wide and sturdy pot support design doesn’t fold, so — with a 5-inch diameter — it’s not the most compact. However, it can still be packed/stashed into a larger pot. And for the quality of the stove, it’s still a great deal.
The reason this canister stove made it on our list is its ingenious configuration specifically for cold-weather cooking. The MSR WindPro II ($109) combines the design of a liquid fuel stove with the lightweight perks and versatility of a canister stove.
This stove has a wide burner with folding pot legs and a fuel line that allows the stove to burn fuel in the upright canister position or an inverted liquid-feed mode. The stove comes with a windscreen and canister stand.
Inverting the canister definitely equates to better performance and fuel efficiency in cold and wind. Anyone who lives at high altitude (hey, Colorado friends!) and frequently camps in colder conditions should consider this stove. And it won’t break the bank.
Jetboil’s newest stove system is designed for solo backpackers who want to keep weight down. The entire system (stove, pot, stand, cup, and lid) weighs just over a pound and packs together nicely.
The biggest perk of this stove is its super-fast boil time — about 3 minutes per liter. Like the previous model, the Jetboil Flash ($110) has an all-in-one design with a push-button igniter, improved stove-vessel integration (locking the pot to the stove), and updated pot and lid designs.
The stove also has a heat-indicating sleeve that changes color to let you know when water is boiling so you don’t waste time or fuel.
Overall, this is a great and durable stove system. However, it does have its limitations, as you can only cook what can fit in the pot. If you’re looking for a stove that can easily boil water and cook the basics quickly, this is a great option.
This new stove ($25) from Primus works really well, offers pretty great simmer control and heat distribution and, best of all, comes with a hard-to-beat price point. It’s a simple construction with no folding elements and easily stashes into a pot or mesh stove bag.
You can also get the new Primus Essential Trail Stove kit (a stove, an anodized aluminum pot, a hybrid pan/pot lid, and a storage bag) for just $60.
The only con we discovered is there’s no resting notch or angled indentation in the pot support design. They are completely level, which makes balancing a well-used pot (one that might have some heat warping or dents) tricky. It’s definitely not a flaw but something to note.
What’s nice is this stove’s pot supports are wide enough for a variety of cookware sizes (we tried it with 1-2L pots and an 8-inch pan).
Weight: 4 oz.
Time to reach boil: Claimed 3.5 minutes
Why this isn’t our top budget choice: It was very close. But ultimately, while this stove weighs a few ounces less than our top budget choice, it also has fewer BTUs, and the burner doesn’t pack down as small. That being said, it’s still a great stove.
For the budget- and weight-conscious hiker, the PocketRocket 2 ($45) is a proven stove at a good price. Weighing in at a scant 2.6 ounces (excluding the fuel canister), this is a supremely packable stove. The serrated supports can hold a variety of pots, and lighting is a simple matter of turning the knob and using a match to ignite.
We’ve had a few close calls when stirring aggressively or bumping the pot, so set it up in a level spot and take care to keep the pot upright. Nobody wants to pick their dinner out of the dirt. The MSR PocketRocket 2 is also one of the best-performing stoves out there in terms of price.
Why it’s not our top choice: Trust us, it was close. But between the PocketRocket 2 and MSR’s new Deluxe model (which offers an integrated pressure regulator and igniter and performs better in wind), the Deluxe won us over.
Weight: 2.6 oz.
Time to reach boil: 3.5-4.5 minutes depending on wind
The BRS3000T perched on a camp table during stove testing in Colorado; (photo/Eric Philips)
Ultralight and by far the lightest canister stove on this list at just 26 g, the BRS-3000T ($17) is a titanium alloy stove manufactured by BRS in China. What we liked about the BRS — it’s ultralight and performs great. In testing, we really liked its packability, easy setup, and fairly good performance in windier weather.
This is our top recommendation if you are looking for a truly ultralight stove (less than a third the weight of an MSR PocketRocket Deluxe).
Why it’s not our top choice: The hinges that allow the pot supports to rotate out are a little stiff (this might get better with time). The pot supports are also a bit more delicate and narrower than on other canister stoves, meaning it’s better for smaller pots (1-1.5L) and ultralight cookware, rather than large pots and pans.
If you are concerned about the camping pot you own being compatible with this stove, we recommend double-checking the dimensions.
GSI Outdoors has long been a popular brand for camping cookware. And with stoves like this, it’s moving more into the technical camping space. The GSI Outdoors Pinnacle Stove ($60) is a high-efficiency backpacking stove with pot supports that swivel down for super-compact storage and swivel up to create a 5-inch-diameter cooking surface.
The first thing you’ll notice on this small but mighty stove is the pot supports. They’re attached to the stove body with grommets and swivel into a notch to lock in place. They also sit slightly higher above the burner than other stoves, which we think contributed a little to this stove’s slightly slower boil time.
That being said, we found this stove to be just as stable as other ultralight options we tested — as long as you pick a good surface.
In terms of performance, the stove boiled fairly well and simmered well too. It’s also a similar price point to other stoves about its size. The Pinnacle made this list because of its compact nature — it’s the smallest and lightest stove out there.
Why it’s not our top choice: This stove is a bit slow to boil but still functions great.
GSI Outdoors also makes a four-season version of the Pinnacle with a fuel line, stove stand legs, and remote burner specifically for alpinists. We only tested it a few times in colder weather, but it burned strong and even and held up pretty well.
One of the most unique things about this integrated canister stove is its ability to work with both propane and butane. That’s a nice option when switching between backpacking and car camping, or if you don’t know what type of fuel will be available wherever you’re traveling. The stove ($130) works great and is one of the most affordable integrated stoves available.
We found it a little slower to boil than the Jetboil Flash but were impressed with how reliably the piezo igniter worked. The main downside is the packed size. The 1.5L pot is overkill for solo backpackers and takes up too much space in ultralight backpacks.
On the plus side, the slightly larger and wider pot means it has a greater surface area to distribute heat. For a couple or group, this is a solid option with a larger capacity and versatile design.
Why it’s not our top choice: It’s not as easy to pack, and the propane fuel adapter is heavy.
The integrated lock-on pot maximizes heat transfer, and the radiant burner means you don’t have to worry about a flame dying in the wind. There are lighter and cheaper options available, but what makes the WindBurner ($150) great is its quick boiling time and ability to work in all manner of weather.
At the end of a long day on the trail, it’s nice to be able to easily fire it up and make yourfavorite dehydrated meal in a flash. And being more efficient means wasting less fuel.
One of our editors used this stove while motorcycle camping for more than a year and never once had a problem. It fired up without a hitch, boiled water quickly, and packed up small.
The canister packs into the pot, and the plastic cup slips on the bottom to create an integrated package. Just remember to remove the cup before cooking. Trust me — it will melt.
Why it’s not our top choice: It’s not ideal for groups, and its price is on the higher end.
These stoves connect to refillable fuel bottles. They are generally filled with white gas, but you can also use other fuels, including kerosene and gasoline. This is ideal if traveling overseas. This stove type can be slightly more complicated to use (in other words, it requires maintenance), but it performs well in cold conditions.
With the option to burn nearly any fuel — including white gas and isobutane-propane — this stove has quickly become a four-season favorite. This is especially true if you find yourself traveling to countries outside North America where fuel options may be limited. It’s not the lightest stove on the market at 13.7 ounces, but its versatility makes up for that.
We’ve used this stove for really tough winter camping, and it has outperformed everything other folks have brought to elk camp. While canister stoves die in cold weather, the WhisperLite Universal ($150) cranks out water-boiling BTUs, even above 10,000 feet.
We had no problem balancing a pot on it. With simmer control, we were able to make everything from fluffy pancakes to delicately scrambled eggs. Plus, it got the water boiling for coffee in no time.
We’ve heard reports of problems with the fuel connector threads stripping, but we haven’t experienced a problem in more than a year of testing.
Because it uses liquid fuel, this stove does require some TLC and stove knowledge, including priming the stove before use and stove maintenance in the field on longer excursions. As long as you familiarize yourself with the stove, you should be set.
One more bonus with liquid fuel — gas is cheap! A gallon of white gas will cost around $10 and should last you for years.
Weight: 13.7 oz.
Time to reach boil: 3.5 minutes per half-liter (white gas)
This multifuel stove ($150) is a great option for travelers and winter campers. The adjustable flame means you can quickly boil a pot of water and perfectly scramble an egg. This is also a great choice if you need to cook for a large group.
We were impressed with the stability, even with large pots. It’s a bit noisy, but it’s a great choice if versatile group cooking is what you’re after.
Weight: 14 oz.
Time to reach boil: 3.5 minutes per half-liter (white gas)
Esbit titanium folding stove, shown with a solid fuel cube; (photo/Mary Murphy)
Ultralight, foolproof, and steady to burn, Esbit’s newer titanium model solid fuel stove ($19) is the best and simplest we’ve used yet. The ultralight design is crazy — even adding in a few days’ worth of fuel, it’s lighter than many of my canister stoves. The Esbit is made of titanium, with three folding legs that swivel out.
One thing I liked about the legs and pot supports is the ability to adjust them to different angles — they are on a swivel and don’t click into place, so you can move the legs 360 degrees. This is a great perk if you’re setting up on uneven terrain or a slightly sloping rock.
The legs and the fuel tray —that’s pretty much it. Light the fuel, sit back, and in about 10 minutes you’ll have a steady flame for boiling water or heating up a basic meal.
This stove is also unique in that it doesn’t require liquid (white gas or alcohol), pressurized fuel, or wood (collecting wood for fires is banned in some protected wildernesses and parks). The fuel is a solid, noncombustible cube that is fairly easy to light — and you can travel with it!
Note: Several reviewers online have noted the fuel cubes have a fishy, malodorous smell to them. We did notice a bit of a pungent smell once unwrapped but didn’t experience any smelly fumes once the cube was burning. It burns clean, and there’s no ash. That being said, we recommend keeping the fuel in a sealable baggy stored separately so the smell isn’t an issue.
Our only con with this stove: It took more than a few tries with matches and is much easier to light with a lighter.
All that, and this stove is under $20. An ultralight steal.
Weight: 11 g
Time to reach boil: 8-12 minutes (10 minutes in testing with a 14g fuel cube)
Anyone keen on ditching fuel and using what nature provides will appreciate this stove ($70). Using small sticks, you can bring a quart of water to a boil in about 10 minutes. Be sure to collect a substantial pile of small sticks before getting started so you can continuously feed the flame.
Because you don’t need to pack fuel, the 9-ounce stove weight is reasonable. And the integrated design allows it to pack down easily.
In our testing, we loved the design which encourages “gasification” of the solid fuel. This means it pretty much burns all the smoke, resulting in very few fumes and a nice, hot fire.
Yes, this stove is pricey and significantly heavier than others on this list, but it’s also more than just a stove. Most of the stove weight is in the integrated battery, which takes energy from a burning fire and converts it to charge your electronics.
So not only do you not need to pack fuel, but you also won’t need to pack a portable battery charger for your next outdoor excursion.
We can attest a lot of time and effort went into this stove’s design. The BioLite CampStove 2 ($150) has lightweight aluminum legs, features a protective exterior between you and the burn chamber, and uses combustion technology to circulate air and increase efficiency.
While there’s not a power switch like on gas stoves, the four fan settings (ranging from low to high) do a great job at controlling the size of the flame. It also doesn’t take too much time to cool after use.
At first glance, we had concerns about the scalloped, curvy pot stand lips (which are designed to be compatible with BioLite’s pot and grill cookware). But upon testing, we had no issues balancing off-brand pots as well, even a small 1L pot.
We also were skeptical of its trail weight, but the components of the CampStove 2 pack within each other nicely. If you’re investing in a stove for longer trips and don’t want to carry excess weight in fuel, consider getting this stove.
For a wood-burning stove, the BioLite also has an impressive boil time at a little over 4.5 minutes.
Constructed of titanium, this sturdy stove ($60) packs down flat and weighs in at a scant 4.6 ounces. Like the Solo Stove, you’ll need to collect a pile of sticks and expect to wait around 10 minutes for a boil.
Be sure to set this on a sturdy surface to maintain airflow. We had problems at one point in a soft, sandy spot due to sinking and lack of oxygen. But placed on a rock, it did great.
On several online platforms, fans of the product have recommended drilling extra holes on the sidewall to increase airflow. But we haven’t tried that.
As with all wood-burning stoves, this will only work in areas with an abundance of sticks, and you’ll need to pay close attention to fire restrictions. Some state parks across the west don’t allow wood-burning stoves.
These win the prize for simple, light, and cheap. Composed of one small fuel unit, alcohol stoves are primitive and far less efficient than other options. A previous favorite among thru-hikers, these are quickly declining as fuel for canister stoves becomes easier to find in small trail towns.
The Solo Stove Alcohol Burner ($20 on sale) is an awesome low-tech or backup stove option for fast and light travel in the backcountry. The stove is fueled by denatured alcohol — simply add in a few ounces of alcohol and light. Solo’s Alcohol Burner has a flame regulator (similar to the simmer controls on canister stoves) and a steady-to-burn design.
Solo’s Alcohol Burner also features a screwtop cap and rubber gasket, so you can store liquid fuel directly inside. It’s a truly compact system.
This stove takes about 5 minutes to bring a liter of water to boil (although wind and weather can add a few minutes to boil time). It weighs just 3.5 ounces and is super compact.
Our only con: This alcohol burner doesn’t come with a pot support (it’s meant to be used in conjunction with a Solo Stove Lite), but there are ways to still make this work. If you are looking for a solid-performing alcohol burner, still consider this one.
The right stove depends on a variety of factors. What works for one person might not suit your particular adventures. Read on for tips on choosing the best backpacking stove.
Stove Use: Cooking vs. Boiling
If you plan to eat mainly dehydrated backpacking meals (just add water), you’ll want a simple stove with a fast boiling time. If, on the other hand, you’d like to cook more elaborate meals, it will be more important to find a stove with better simmer control, and maybe a wider burner.
Think about how often and for what type of cooking you’ll be using your backpacking stove before buying.
Stove Packed Size and Weight
The stoves on this list weigh anywhere from an ounce to 2 pounds (but most are within the 3- to 9-ounce range). Some can fit in the palm of your hand, and some take up a bit more room.
Not everyone needs the tiniest stove on the market. Especially if you camp year-round, you’ll want to choose a four-season stove, or one better rated for cold performance.
There are also a few differences to consider between size and packed size. For example, the Jetboil stove itself is larger and slightly heavier than other canister stoves on our list. However, it integrates with all the other components and packs down super small (including the pot, lid, stove, and fuel).
Weight is another consideration. If you are going on a 2-day overnight, weight won’t matter as much as, say, a 30-day wilderness trek.
Also, think about what other gear you’ll be carrying. Do you have a lightweight tent that doesn’t take up much space? Or will you be carrying lots of equipment, like a camera or climbing gear?
If you frequent forests or parks that allow folks to collect firewood, or if you are going to an area where fuel is harder to come by, maybe a wood stove would be the best option. If you’re an ounce counter, an ultralight canister stove may be what you’re after.
Price
Will you be using this stove every weekend? Twice a month? Twice a year on big trips?
It makes sense to invest more if you’ll be relying on it to feed yourself regularly. If you’ll use it only fairly often or if it’s for emergencies, consider purchasing a less expensive model.
That being said, if you need a backpacking stove, there are stoves in every price range: $10-40, $40-70, and over $100.
Winter and Cold Performance
Not all stoves are created equal, and nowhere is this more evident than in the frigid temps of winter camping conditions. If you camp in the warmer months only, this isn’t a concern.
But if you head out in the winter, you’ll probably use your stove to melt snow and boil a lot of water. You need to be able to rely on it when the mercury drops.
For this, you’ll want a liquid fuel or four-season stove. We’ve found liquid fuel stoves to be the most reliable choice in winter.
Other Considerations
Group size: If you regularly backpack and plan meals with a group (families, college students), consider dispersing the weight and investing in a larger group cookset and stove. Or, a wider burner that can accommodate a variety of pots and pans.
If you’re a solo adventurer, a smaller canister stove is a fine choice.
Why You Should Trust Us
Our entire staff contributed to testing and using a variety of backpacking stoves over the years. But every year, we test new and updated models. In addition to testing in group settings, we dedicate a lot of time on personal trips packing in and using these stoves.
We put extra-close attention on each stove’s burner performance in wind and colder conditions, as well as its general usability. Our author and editor Mary Murphy has spent over 250 days in the backcountry, on solo backpacking, camping, and pack-paddleboarding trips, and has also section-hiked the Appalachian Trail and Colorado Trail.
FAQ
What’s the Difference Between a Camping Stove and a Backpacking Stove?
Camp stoves and backpacking stoves are both built for use in the outdoors, but vary wildly in features. Camping stoves weigh anywhere from 6 to 15 pounds, and they’re designed for use on a camp table or picnic table in more front-country settings (you won’t want to carry one far).
On the other hand, backpacking stoves are designed to hike with. They weigh 1-12 ounces, and they are designed to pack small to fit in a pocket or pack.
Backpacking stoves tend to have a single burner, with some sort of fuel connector, regulator/simmer dial, and pot support platform. That’s it!
What Is the Best Backpacking Stove?
The best backpacking stove that won us over in testing was the MSR PocketRocket Deluxe (the PocketRocket 2, the previous model, is also a solid stove).
However, we recognize that this isobutane canister stove might not fit everyone’s needs, or maybe budget. Which is why we’ve compiled our list of best backpacking stoves by fuel type, and also differentiated by price and size.
What Is the Smallest/Lightest Backpacking Stove?
The lightest backpacking stove — of any fuel type — on our list was the Esbit Titanium at only 11 g (less than half an ounce)! The smallest canister stove we tested was the BRS3000Tat 0.9 ounces, with the GSI Pinnacle coming in second at 2.4 ounces.
For just a few more ounces, and with a few more features (piezo igniter), you can consider our top choice, the MSR PocketRocket Deluxe, which rings in at 2.9 ounces.
BTUs Explained
BTU stands for British Thermal Unit — essentially, it’s a measurement unit of heat. In stove speak, BTUs refer to the energy required to raise the temperature of boiling water — higher BTUs mean a stove will have a more powerful output of energy and/or heat (not necessarily hotter).
Lower BTUs have a weaker output, but are often better for simmering and providing a more controlled regulation of your stove’s flame.
How Much Should I Spend?
As you can see, stoves range widely in price! But expect to pay at least $25-40 for a durable backpacking stove.
If you are on a tight budget, consider waiting until your favorite stove is on sale. (Pro tip: bookmark this article and check back on price throughout the season.)
Tips for Using a Backpacking Stove
When you buy your first backpacking stove, invest in a few extra fuel canisters, too. This lets you have a stockpile for spur-of-the-moment trips and early-morning endeavors — you won’t have to run to a store to track down fuel.
Always read the instructions. (Yes, even if you are familiar with camp stoves.) The instructions will tell you how to prime your stove, and might even have tips on cleaning and repair.
Avoid spills by setting up on the flattest spot possible. Flat rocks make great cooking surfaces.
Always bring matches to light your stove in case of emergency. Yes, even if your stove has a piezo igniter. Igniters can fail, lighters can break, and there’s nothing sadder than a cold meal because you couldn’t get a flame.
Never cook inside your tent or vehicle. On top of being a fire hazard, this can cause carbon monoxide poisoning and death. If you camp frequently in rainy climates, invest in a tarp and some guy line for a safe overhead kitchen shelter.
The Best Backpacking Tents of 2022
Whether you’re looking to spend 100 nights on the trail or stick to a tight budget, we’ve found the best backpacking tents of 2022. Read more…
The Best Backpacking Sleeping Bags of 2022
A sleeping bag is one of your most important pieces of camping gear. We’ve found the best backpacking sleeping bags for every use and budget. Read more…
This snow-traveling pub is bringing suds to the slopes — literally.
The BeerCat is one of 10 Barrel Brewing’s famous mini-pubs … and by “mini,” we do mean mini. The compact taproom, built by snowboard legend Mike Basich in 2019, lives inside a custom 1987 Spryte snowcat.
Think snowcat + beer = BeerCat, what 10 Barrel calls “the ultimate mountain beer delivery system.”
For the full experience, take this four-part virtual tour or, even better, visit in person. The 10 Barrel BeerCat will be posted up at Eldora Mountain, Colo., this weekend.
Home » Food / Hydration » 3 Tips to Optimize LifeStraw ‘Peak Series’ Water Filters
LifeStraw revamped its namesake water filter straw and other filtration systems based on years of customer feedback. We asked the brand how best to care for these new products.
It took 17 years, but LifeStraw found ways to improve the performance and usability of its filters. The brand says the redesign gives the Peak filtration systems more versatility and a faster flow rate through its microfilter.
The original straw came out to achieve a goal of a personal water filter. Once the brand grew its product line to include other filtration systems, it saw a need to reverse engineer its complete line to be more compatible. LifeStraw also worked on the durability of its bladders and improved the filter flow rates up to 3 L per minute, according to the brand.
We talked with the brand to find ways to avoid user pitfalls and get maximum use and lifespan from the Peak water filtration systems.
We talked with Tara Lundy, LifeStraw’s chief brand officer, who has worked with the company and used its filters for almost a decade. She explained what went into the redesign of the Peak Series and how to keep the filter systems working at their — ahem — peak performance.
The Peak Series Redesign
Lundy told us that the main goal of the redesign was to add versatility and durability. Both would address common frustrations about water filters — both LifeStraw and competitors — expressed by users in the field.
The brand’s engineering team sought to breathe new life into its 17-year-old straw design. “We were trying to figure out ways that we can add threading and adapters without having separate pieces to make the straw more functional,” said Lundy.
The engineers also saw that as a way to introduce new membrane configurations that could improve flow rate as well as prevent air traps. From there, the design team incorporated more robust materials in its bladder bags and its new leakproof caps.
(Photo/LifeStraw)
Going Modular
For greater versatility, the LifeStraw Peak Series uses a modular design. This enables more ways to use the filters, including interchangeably between products.
“We were trying to find ways to cut down on needed amounts of gear by creating something that serves as both a dromedary or water storage device in addition to offering the filtration component so you don’t have to carry two separate things,” Lundy said.
The Peak squeeze bottles and gravity systems are made with a new membrane and come with a backwash plunger accessory. New soft-sided reservoir materials should add durability while the plunger and revamped microfilter should result in a better performance against sand and silt for more water flow over its lifespan. (More on individual products later.)
One example of a new use the modular design allows is evidenced in the squeeze bottles. Now you can remove the filter from inside the bottle and thread it onto the outside. That lets you compress the bottle all the way down to access the last bit of water inside.
At camp, this function works well to filter water into cooking pots or several cups. It also hooks up to a gravity system.
(Photo/LifeStraw)
The New Straw
Leading off is a smaller build of the original straw, which will now fit the mouth of a standard plastic water bottle — still a common hiker staple and includes a built-in gravity hose attachment. The new Peak straw continues to work as a personal filter that comes in handy during an emergency.
“I think the reason why [the straw] has always been so popular is that it’s a relatively inexpensive way to have an emergency backup solution,” Lundy said. “It might not be the thing that you’re using to hydrate on a daily basis, but if it’s only 2 ounces and very intuitive to use, you have that option.”
In fact, LifeStraw continues to sell these personal straws in bundles, as people tend to keep them in emergency kits at home and in cabins, boats, backpack essential stashes, etc.
(Photo/LifeStraw)
3 Tips to Improve Water Filter Performance
While LifeStraw has designed its products to work around common issues, there are some areas where the user can heed these tips and get more use and better performance from their filters.
Startup: You’re Doing It Wrong
New water filters or water filters that have been dormant need a bit more work to get them back into a more free-flowing state. That’s actually a feature, not a bug.
“Generally, at startup, it’s going to be a slightly slower flow rate for a few sips or uses,” Lundy said. She explained that a clogged filter is more likely caused by an air trap or drying out than grit from water.
In the first use, there’s likely some air trapped inside. It’s best to wet the membrane and take a few hard sips in the case of the straw, or use the plunger for the other systems to push water through the filter and unlock the flow rate.
For the new Peak line, LifeStraw engineers worked on “venting” — which is a way to allow air to escape the filter’s membrane — and a gravity hose to keep the flow rate going.
You can use the reservoir to push water through the filter or rely on gravity for a slow-drip activation while you’re off hiking.
There’s also a faster, straightforward approach: Suck on the end of the hose, spit out the initial water that hits your lips, and let whatever was in the hose hit the ground. Suction is a stronger force to pull air out of the filter and hose and is the shortcut to unlocking a faster flow rate.
Long-Term Storage
If you’re not using a filter for a long period of time, such as during a camping offseason, you should take steps to prevent it from drying out.
By storing it in water, the filter remains in a hydrophilic state. That means it will be easier to get it back into peak performance. You can also add a teaspoon of salt to fight the growth of algae or bacteria.
Besides the filter, you can rinse out the bladders and caps with dish soap or bleach and then let them air dry. Store them with the caps off.
When it’s time to reuse, you’ll want to flush the stale water and salt, which should be easy to detect.
Note: This applies to membrane-only filters, which is what the Peak collection uses. (Filters with carbon should be stored dry.)
Avoid Freezing
In simple terms, a water filter is a series of tiny holes that block larger particulates and let water squeeze through.
The LifeStraw membranes microfilters consist of small straws with microscopic pores that measure 0.2 microns in diameter. This is small enough to allow water past but will catch contaminants like bacteria, parasites, and even microplastics.
A frozen filter is a compromised filter. You’ll get a great flow rate, but no filtration. A wet filter that freezes means the water expands and stretches the filter’s holes. When it thaws, those larger holes could then allow larger particles to pass through — like silt and dirt, or potentially harmful bacteria if it’s present in the water source.
Whether you’re hiking, camping, or backcountry skiing in freezing temperatures, you should disconnect the filter and store it inside your jacket. Yep, that smartphone pocket may be better used as a water filter pocket.
During shoulder season or in alpine conditions, campers should separate the filter and store it inside their tents just in case the temperature dips below freezing overnight. This is another benefit that the LifeStraw team thought of, being able to remove and store the Peak series filters separate from the water storage.
Backflushing
File this under tips you may already know but still don’t do enough.
During heavy bouts of use, like a multiday hike with the filter, use the plunger accessory to regularly backflush the filter to keep up the flow rate.
For the unfamiliar, backflushing involves running water from the side providing drinking water and out the side attached to the water source. With the plunger, you can draw up clean, filtered water and then screw it onto the “out” side of the filter.
When you push the plunger down, it will force water through the filter and flush out silt and other debris. A few backflush rinses should restore the flow rate, and then it’s ready to be used normally again. (The Peak Series squeeze bottles and gravity filters come with a plunger accessory.)
With the straw, you can draw water to your lips and simply blow it back through a few times for similar results.
This new version of the brand’s iconic straw introduces a new grip, a faster water flow rate, and can be integrated with a gravity hose or squeeze bottle. The filter should last up to 5 years of use.
These come with a tethered cap as well as a leakproof over-cap that LifeStraw says has twice the durability of other bottles. The bottles can function as hydration flasks or can be used to push water through an outward-mounted filter to provide water for others. The brand also integrated these with other Peak gravity systems by removing the filters.
Both come with a Peak Membrane Microfilter and backwash plunger.
Made for backpacking and small camping groups, the 3L gravity bags include a quick connector hose, carabiner, leakproof cap for water storage, easy carry strap, and backwash plunger.
The filter can be removed to work as a standalone “straw” and can be used with standard water bottles.
LifeStraw calls this a dromedary/filtration hybrid system. This high-capacity reservoir can be stored in camp or in a vehicle with a leakproof cap.
When it’s time to provide the camp with water, a filter and gravity hose can attach and start filtering water down below. As with the rest of the line, the removable filter can be used on its own, with a smaller Peak squeeze bottle or with standard water bottles.
LifeStraw microfilters continue to offer protection against bacteria and parasites, as well as microplastics, silt, sand, and cloudiness.
The new Peak Series builds off its reputation among campers, hikers, and other outdoor enthusiasts with a revamped line of water filtration options that promise improved performance.
What’s more, the brand has met the standards to become Climate Neutral Certified and a certified B-corp. It also continues its pledge to provide a year of safe water to one child for every purchase.
This article is sponsored by LifeStraw. Learn more about the Peak Collection of hydration and water filtration systems online.
After 17 Years, LifeStraw Upgrades Iconic Filter Straw With New ‘Peak Series’
After 17 years, the outdoor water filtration specialist has updated its original filter straw — and launched a new generation of Peak Series filtering devices along with it. Read more…
According to a report by the New York Times, the January 6 Committee is divided on whether to criminally refer Trump to the Justice Department.
The panel previously said that Trump and members of his campaign “engaged in a criminal conspiracy to defraud the United States.”
The Committee’s vice chair Liz Cheney on Sunday responded to the New York Times report during an appearance on CNN’s State of the Union.
“There’s a dispute on your committee, as I don’t need to tell you some people feel like a referral, which actually has no legal weight, would only taint the process under which Attorney General Merrick Garland might act. Some feel that that’s the wrong argument, that ‘right is right’ and the committee has the evidence it has. Where do you come down?” Tapper asked Cheney.
“There’s not really a dispute on the committee,” Cheney responded.
“The committee is working in a really collaborative way to discuss these issues, as we are with all of the issues we’re addressing, and we’ll continue to work together to do so. So I wouldn’t characterize there as being a dispute on the committee,” she added.
“It is absolutely clear that what President Trump was doing … was unlawful,” Cheney said.
“We have not made a decision about referrals on the committee,” Cheney said when asked if the committee has evidence to criminally refer Trump.
Miami-Dade Mayor Daniella Levine Cava declared a state of emergency over housing affordability as rent continues to skyrocket on Friday.
“Over the last year, we have also become one of the most unaffordable regions in the country,” said Mayor Cava during her press conference.
“I’m putting together a plan called the Building Blocks program, and it will be as a first step. Today, we are announcing a new and additional $13 million into our emergency rental assistance program,” Cava added.
“Our workers, our seniors, our families have been burdened with unprecedented rent increases over 30%, higher than last year. For single mothers, for older adults, for our students, this is simply not an option. It’s not an option for any of us,” Cava continued.
Finally declaring a housing affordability crisis, Miami-Dade County Mayor Daniella Levine Cava and her colleagues face the daunting challenge of trying to make homes more affordable for residents.
“We have become the most unaffordable place in the country,” Levine Cava said Friday, noting that’s “what’s different now.” As a first step, the county mayor announced the Building Blocks Program, an effort to use $13.4 million in federal funding for Miami-Dade’s emergency rental assistance program to help tenants struggling to pay rent.
The program’s key pieces are: The county will pay up to $3,000 a month to people behind on their monthly rent payments by up to a year; if your landlord raises the rent between 1% and 20%, the county will assist by covering up to 20% of your monthly payment for three months; and for tenants hit with rent hikes of more than 20%, the county will pay a portion of that increase.
Residents with an income below 80% of the county’s annual median income are eligible. That includes individuals earning less than $50,650, couples earning less than $57,650, families of three earning less than $65,100 and families of four earning less than $72,300.
Also, last month the county mayor began requiring property owners to give a 60-day notice, rather than the former 30 days, to tenants when their monthly rents are going to increase by 5% or more.
A day after purchasing a 9.2% passive stake in Twitter on Monday, Tesla CEO and SpaceX founder Elon Musk was designated as one of Twitter’s Board of Directors on Tuesday in a deal that would prohibit him from owning more than 14.9% of the media giant’s common stock.
Twitter Chief Executive Officer, Parag Agrawal, announced on Tuesday that they will appoint Elon Musk to their Board of Directors serving as a Class II Director saying “he would bring great value to our Board.”
“I’m excited to share that we’re appointing @elonmusk to our board! Through conversations with Elon in recent weeks, it became clear to us that he would bring great value to our Board,” said Agrawal in a tweet.
Elon Musk immediately responded and promised to make ‘significant improvements to the biased social media platform in the coming months.
