34.1 F
New York
Sunday, November 28, 2021

REVEALED: Milwaukee Elections Executive Woodall-Vogg Who Laughed About the Election Steal on Election Night Was Caught Handing Over Sensitive Election Data to Liberal Groups Before Election

In the early hours of November 4th in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, a batch of 143,379 ballots, all for Joe Biden were dropped. 

On Saturday we unearthed an email that shows the culprits behind the ‘drop’ were laughing about it.

We all now know about the many states that dropped huge numbers of ballots stealing the race for Joe Biden.  On the morning of November 4th, America woke up to see the results of the massive fraud in multiple swing states.

In Wisconsin, over 140,000 ballots for Joe Biden alone were dropped in Milwaukee, giving Biden the lead.

TRENDING: BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Uncovered Email Shows Milwaukee Elections Executive Woodall-Vogg Laughing About the Election Steal on Election Night

“Where Did These ‘Votes’ Come From?” President Trump On Hundreds of Thousands of Ballots Dropped All for Biden the Morning After the Election

We’ve referred to this fraudulent tactic as the drop and roll.

On Saturday we uncovered an email to Claire Woodall-Vogg, the executive director for elections in Milwaukee.

In the email the sender, Ryan Chew, from the Election Group shared:

“Damn, Claire, you have a flair for drama, delivering just the margin needed at 3:00 am.  I bet you had those votes counted at midnight, and just wanted to keep the world waiting.”

Ms. Claire is the Executive Director of the Election Commission of the city of Milwaukee.

We reported that Claire Woodall-Vogg was working alone late at night with the voting machines in Milwaukee.  Her actions then were suspect, now they are borderline criminal.

Developing: Milwaukee Elections Chief Lost Elections Flash Drive in Morning Hours of November 4th When Democrats Miraculously Found 120,000 Votes for Joe Biden

And now there’s more…
Milwaukee Election Director Claire Woodall-Vogg was also giving daily reports on voting data to Democrat operative Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein and private liberal organizations before the election on exactly who was voting.

Wisconsin radio host Dan O’Donnell told his audience this about Woodall-Vogg’s actions, “In my estimation, the only reason for this is the creation of a massive, and I mean massive ballot harvesting operation ahead of 2020 presidential election.”

The MacIver Institute in Wisconsin gained access to the emails from Spitzer-Rubenstein and Woodall-Vogg.

Woodall-Vogg admits to handing over the daily reports to the liberal groups.

Once early voting started, she was providing him with a daily update on the numbers of absentee ballots returned and still outstanding in each ward.

“Here’s what I’ll need,” Spitzer-Rubenstein wrote to her in late October, “1) Number of ballot preparation teams, 2) Number of returned ballots per ward, 3) Number of outstanding ballots per ward.”

Even with this private data sharing that no other organization received (or should have received), Spitzer-Rubenstein still wanted more. He wanted access to the Milwaukee Election Commission’s voter database.

“We’re hoping there’s an easier way to get the data out of WisVote than you having to manually export it every day or week,” he wrote. “To that end, we have two questions: 1. Would you or someone else on your team be able to do a screen-share so we can see the process for an export? 2. Do you know if WisVote has an API [application programming interface] or anything similar so that it can connect with other software apps? That would be the holy grail (but I’m not expecting it to be that easy).”

“While I completely understand and appreciate the assistance that is trying to be provided,” Woodall-Vogg replied, “I am definitely not comfortable having a non-staff member involved in the function of our voter database, much less recording it.”

That may have been a bridge too far, but Woodall-Vogg still gave Spitzer-Rubenstein exclusive access to the database in the form of daily reports. Why? What exactly was the National Vote at Home Institute doing with its daily reports? Was it making sure that people were actually voting from home by going door-to-door to collect ballots from voters who had not yet turned theirs in?

How is this not criminal conduct?

Woodall-Vogg may want to lawyer up.

Links to check out

Latest Articles