The ruling class political parasites are now telling us that “very dense outbreaks” of the “delta variant” are to be expected. “It’s going to be hyper-regionalized, where there are certain pockets of the country [where] we can have very dense outbreaks,” Dr. Scott Gottlieb said Sunday on CBS News’ “Face the Nation.”

“Delta Variant” Fear Mongering Reason Confirmed By MSM

And where would those “hyper-regionalized” outbreaks be taking place? Where people have refused to be injected with the experimental gene therapy shot, of course:

The most vulnerable areas continue to be those with low vaccination rates and low rates of immunity from prior infections. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, many southern states have vaccination rates that lag behind the national average.

“I think as you look across the United States, if you’re a community that has low vaccination rates and you also think that there was low immunity from prior infection, so the virus really hasn’t coursed through the local population, those communities are vulnerable,” Gottlieb said. “So, I think governors need to be thinking about how they build out health care resources in areas of the country where you still have a lot of vulnerability.”

The ruling class is doing their part to keep the fear alive as well, even in red states:

Governor Asa Hutchinson of Arkansas, a state where hospital admissions are up 30%, expressed concern about the Delta COVID-19 variant and low vaccination rates in his state.

“The Delta variant is a great concern to us. We see that impacting our increasing cases and hospitalizations,” Hutchinson said on “Face the Nation.” The governor also noted that vaccine hesitancy is high in his state, which he attributed to conspiracy theories, the pause in Johnson & Johnson’s one-shot regimen in April, and individuals simply not believing in the efficacy of the virus. –CBS News

Let’s help out the master governor. It isn’t “conspiracy theory” or the pause in the J&J jab that is making some refuse the “vaccine.” It’s the fact that most people understand that this is a gigantic hoax and was never a pandemic, and even if it was, we know we don’t need a vaccine for a disease with a 99.96% survival rate (even by your own inflated and probably erroneous statistics.)

Break free from the left vs. right paradigm lie.  It’s just that, a lie to keep us divided and manufacture consent to your preferred ruler. No politician has our best interests in mind.

The ruling class and propaganda outlets in the United Kingdom claim that the Delta variant now accounts for 99% of new COVID cases. They are using data from Public Health England. Gottlieb says the United States is only a month or two behind the U.K. in terms of their experience with the variant.

“They’re seeing cases grow. They’re certainly not taking off with the same velocity that we’ve seen in past epidemics. The other thing that we’re observing about the U.K. experience right now is it’s not having the same impact. So they’ve had about 90,000 cases, they’ve had about 1,000 hospitalizations. The vast majority are in people who are unvaccinated. Only 8% of people who have been fully vaccinated are among the hospitalized patients,” Gottlieb said. “And so you have a situation where you have a population that has more immunity, not just through vaccination, but also through prior infection. So it’s not having the same impact in terms of causing severe death and disease as it was during the last epidemic.” –CBS News

But wait, PHE also said fully vaccinated people are still dying from the COVID-19 scamdemic and that means the vaccine is “effective.” In fact, the Guardian actually reported that MOST of those who die with COVID-19 are “fully vaccinated.”

Wow.  We live in the strangest of times.  The lies continue and all we can do is keep enhancing our critical thinking, therefore boosting our ability to spot these lies. Stay alert and prepared.  This is really ramping up with the propaganda from the masters that the slaves are expected to believe.

This article was originally published by Don Via Jr. at The Free Thought Project. 

A new study from the National Bureau of Economic Research has put yet another nail in the already closed coffin of the pro-lockdown narrative.

Over the past twelve months economic researchers, data analysts, medical professionals, and policy critics alike — as well as we journalists who’ve covered their findings — have all collectively reported ad nauseam the absolutely useless farce that was, and in many places still are, the use of stay at home orders and other lockdown policies as a means of combating Covid-19.

Just within this month alone, TFTP has covered two major findings regarding the study of the impact of lockdowns. On June fifth, an MIT scientist reported a data analysis of the economic impact of the lockdown — noting that whilst it played a key contributing role to the sharp rise of unemployment, it did not make a significant reduction in deaths.

And just days ago, on June 22, a Harvard University study reiterated the fact that while this policy did not save lives it simultaneously decimated the economy; while modern robber barons such as Zuckerberg, Gates, and Bezos saw their portfolios expand exponentially. This was yet another report that, much like the aforementioned, did not receive national headlines from the corporate media.

Now this most recent study from the NBER compounds these findings even further. After analyzing data from 44 countries and all 50 states, they have found that not only have these restrictions not saved lives, and greatly exacerbated the destruction of the working class — but have in fact resulted in an increase of excess mortality. At the end of the day, they cost more lives than they saved.

Among the findings for the study, the authors conclude —

• In every region the study observed, it found that the utilization of stay-at-home mandates resulted in either no change or increases in excess deaths.
• In every U.S. state, the study found either “no change in excess deaths, or in many U.S. states, spikes in excess deaths following the implementation of shelter-in-place policies.”
• Countries and states that had longer duration stay-at-home mandates were found to have had higher excess deaths.
• Countries or states that implemented stay-at-home mandates earlier did not have lower excess deaths than countries and states that were slower to put restrictions in place.
• States did not see decreases in excess deaths until 20 weeks after the lockdown policies were brought into effect.
• An exception was found in the countries Australia, Malta, and New Zealand, and the island of Hawaii where the shelter-in-place orders that were issued showed a slight decrease in excess deaths.

Unfortunately reports like this are becoming commonplace among those who “follow the science”, that is, those of us who actually do so rather than simply claiming to, only to then regurgitate whatever narrative is parroted by propagandists.

These consequences and much more have already been recounted by this author in a previous piece for The Free Thought Project. In January we covered a report from the Oxford Committee for Famine Relief demonstrating the impact of worldwide lockdowns and their far-reaching socio-economic ramifications.

Chiefly among them, the devastating nature in which these policies have been found to have undone the last 30 years of progress made against extreme poverty. More so, that hundreds of millions of people are now being pushed towards famine as a direct result of lockdowns.

Most shockingly of all, the pandemic projection models which were used as the justification for global lockdowns were found to be completely inaccurate and unreliable from the start. They were so flawed, the Imperial College professor who designed said projections was fired from his position for disregarding his own data and breaking restrictions.

These are just a few of the so-called unintended consequences to human health and life that came with shutting down the entire world on a whim. Not once did our pundits or politicians ever encourage strengthening the building blocks of basic health such as nutrition or exercise. They didn’t mandate an uptake in vitamins and nutrients, fresh air, sunlight, or fruits and vegetables, proper sleep, clean water, or extra cardiovascular conditioning.

None of the strategies that are actually capable of naturally strengthening the human immune system were mentioned. Instead, they went straight for the most absurd authoritarian measure — measures that, in many cases, actually obstruct those very same building blocks for a naturally healthy body.

The consequences were monstrous. In addition to the financial impacts, other costs of life are skyrocketing. It has now been thoroughly documented that lockdowns have lead to a drastic rise in all of the following —

• Drug use and subsequent overdose deaths are increasing at an alarming rate.
• Deaths by suicide are on the rise both nationally and internationally.
• More heartbreaking still, what is now being referred to as an epidemic of child suicide as the self-inflicted deaths of children are now on the rise.
• As well as causing a noticeable increase in both domestic violence and child abuse. Including sexual assault, the world over, as human rights groups have warned that human trafficking has surged during lockdowns.

All the while, the world’s poor and working-class are decimated as wealthy elitists and political predators capitalize upon the largest transfer of wealth and power in human history.

To be quite blunt, these policies should be regarded as a crime against humanity.

It goes well beyond a nauseating example of government malfeasance. Policymakers were rash, reactionary, and criminally negligent. Blood is on their hands and a lot of it. We should all be quite frank about it; the decisions of lawmakers to enact these policies is directly contributory to the deaths of countless people. They are culpable, and liability should most certainly be applicable.

Manslaughter is generally defined as the unintentional killing of another human being. So while democide may not fit the bill due to a seeming lack of intent behind these killings; what does one even call mass state-sponsored criminally negligent manslaughter? Is there even a word for it? If not someone ought to think of one quick because there are a lot of government officials that deserve to be charged with it.